Wednesday, July 16, 2008

 

Islamic [Fascism] Extremism for Dummies.. Carter’s naivete provided Islamic extremism w/ a national flag & breeding ground for exporting Islamofascism

Islamic [Fascism] Extremism for Dummies... Carter’s naivete provided Islamic extremism with a national flag and a breeding ground for exporting Islamofascism abroad and into the 21st century http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27172

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Friday, August 31, 2007

 

Flying Lying Imams’ conspiracy theories - Islamic Crime of denying the Jihad attack on 911

Flying Lying Imams’ conspiracy theories


The Garbage “holiness”, Muslim Mullahs’ despicable industry of “conspiracy theories” on the Islamic attack of September 11, 2001


This is the story of ‘flying Imams’, no, not that one in which they’ve managed to put fears into ordinary passengers with “holy-Islamic” Pro bloodthirsty Bin-Laden statements, that the “moderate” terrorists organizations’ front goup: CAIR tried to “defend” afterwards.


This is about [though the same type of] imams that are in the line of how to commit the crime upon crime, after the Islamic murdering innocent people on 9/11/2001, how to add yet another Islamic crime, to “deny” it, to fly a lie after lie.


We have been following the crime-trail since post Islamists’ attack of 9/11, the rolling series of ‘theories’ ever since the Islamic fascist terror organization [that is involved in bloodshed like in: Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, etc.] Iranian-Syrian group: Hezbullah, has strarted so cruely with a painful outcry like how come ‘only’ a few hundreds of the three thousands happened to be of a certain religion/ethnicity, a group that [for them] is situated on the top of all infidels which they despise, their ‘buddies’ in crime the neo-Nazis picked it up pretty quick, they even added a new dimention a few months later on, as they kept updating, attaching to it the poor man that owned the WTC buildings, then along came the spider fantasies of incoorperating all kind of ideas into the CIA [here, major help already came from the radicals among the radical left (especially such “writers” as that Justin Raymundo - a combination of self-hatred, hatred for Jews and sneaky liar, one of the wonders of the “anti-war” website that has been so hospitable to this racist pig, this horrific Nazi with “anti-war” sheep clothing even has “proof” for his stories, imagine that), moreso from France, right at the beginning of talks of an Iraqi operation by President G. W. Bush], followed by “questionisning” certain sciences of falling buildings, that have been all debuked of course.


You’ll be surprised to know the nature of the main “inventors” of these “theories” are “moderate” devoted Mullahs, seeing the heavy price they paid/pay with their rotten image for their brothers in faith’s deed-massacre on that infamous day.


One of them that is very active on YouTube actually tried to pose (they all do) at first as a “white lefty guy”, but it didn’t take too long to crack him via a few cross examination, until he cofessed in his Quranic devotions about his leading of a mosque.


The fact that radical leftists would “buy” Islamic made ideas, isn’t all that surprising, after all, they “need” all help they can get, never mind that the Islamists would have a liberal’s throat cut just as fast, if not faster [for Islamists’ hypocritical pro-morality play/stage].


One of the main websites of these ‘conspiracy theorists’ is “what really happened”, a group of ‘Palestinian’ and other Arab Muslim militant fascists, that sits day and night and “cooks” up fantasy plans, that [of course] non of them would ever believe. \par


All these fantasy-bites comes usually with a side order of “humanizing” the ‘Palestinian’ butchers, those fake “victims” that their targets are babies in their mothers’ hands, or any unarmed civilians on busses, restaurants, wedding halls, etc., heck they are even that brave, they can even shoot behind their own little kids, just as soon as they can get the cameras rolling to show the World-TV how “bad” the Zionists are…


This “website” that if wouldn’t be so ugly in it’s immoral implication would amount to nothing more than a champion for child play ‘let’s pretend’, was very busy on how to “counter” the awful truth about the infamous documented ‘Palestinian’ adults/children dancing in the streets at the Islamic massacre on 9/11, with some “story” of “other” people dancing, which of course never happened.


These “holy” Muslim clerics’ websites [up-to today 25 August 2007, at least] will never try to offer any real [non-fantasy] ideas on how to help Iraqi Arabs, or the Arab “Palestinians” from massacres between themselves, or anything that might help their ’society’ in any shape or form, again, because just as typical radical Islamists would hate it if there’s a ‘Palestine’ state, after all they might lose almost an entire card with what to play again at the entire non-Muslim world.


Do the few of the radical leftists that “buy” some of the Mullahs stuff, ever come to realize what kind of plans does a Mullahcracy hold for liberals in the west?


Just after you wipe you smile off at each and every silly little theory they come up with, remember to “see” the Mullahs praying on their rug before and after.



Technorati - ]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 03, 2007

 

(Got Sharia?) 12 killed, 140 injured in clashes at Pakistan mosque

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

 

The Myth of Moderate Mullahs It's still Khomeini's Iran

The Myth of Moderate Mullahs It's still Khomeini's Iran

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/401lsgzo.asp

If the Reagan administration had learned in 1987 that the clerical regime in Tehran was doing what it is doing today, would Washington have approved of preventive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities? If Reagan and company had seen Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini rapidly constructing uranium-enrichment centrifuges in underground facilities, pushing doggedly ahead on heavy-water research and a plutonium-making nuclear reactor, and spending profusely on the development of long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles that are effective weapons only if topped with WMD warheads, would more of the U.S. foreign-policy establishment have urged our European allies to support severe sanctions to dissuade the mullahs from developing the bomb? Would leading members of the Democratic party, who then controlled the House and the Senate, have been sympathetic to a military response to the mullahs' nuclear ambitions, or would they have argued for another round of engagement, quickly forgetting their disparagement of the White House's and the CIA's 1985 search for bribable "moderates" in a terrorist-supporting state with American blood on its hands?



Even with the Cold War fear of Soviet reactions, Reagan might well have ordered a strike by the United States--probably with the encouragement of his secretary of state, George Shultz, the most farsighted official ever about the dangers of terrorism, and a man not averse to using force in international affairs. The odds are good that many Democrats in Congress would have applauded any aggressive decision--with or without accompanying protests about neglect of the War Powers Act and Congress's monopoly on declarations of war. The










Western Europeans might have expressed their dismay at American cowboyism, although the criticism might have been short-lived since the clerical regime then was regularly unleashing terrorism in Europe. Twenty years ago the Western Europeans had not so fully entered their post-Kantian world where soft power always trumps hard. Also, the French and the Germans were massively invested in Iraq, then at war with Iran. The Soviets, of course, would have been furious, their distaste for American unilateralism checked somewhat by their concern for Saddam Hussein. The U.S. ambassador at the United Nations, Vernon Walters, would no doubt have had to live through a public excoriation of Reagan's America as a lawless, aggressive, third-world-thumping rogue state.



Things are obviously different now, primarily because the Islamic Republic has changed. One could see the changes beginning in the 1980s, as the wreckage of the Iran-Iraq war was slowly dissolving the violent love affair that young Iranian Shiite males had had with God and the charismatic Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. But back then it was too early to tell how losing the war would play out on the clerical elite.



For those who believe in "diplomacy first, diplomacy only" for dealing with the mullahs' quest for nuclear weaponry, the perceived changes in the Islamic Republic are what make the dovish case compelling. Khomeini with a nuke, even more than Saddam with atomic weapons, would have been just too unsettling for us to have reposed our confidence in the theory of deterrence. But in 2007, Ali Khamenei, the clerical leader of Iran, his president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the most politically adept mullah of the revolution, seem somehow less threatening, allowing many to accept what would have been unacceptable 20 years ago. Together, they just don't have the right mix of charisma, white-hot faith, unpredictable power, and history to make us, and Iranians, tremble the way we all did with the Imam. If Ahmadinejad were the sole ruler of Iran, then American and Israeli fighter-bombers probably would have already annihilated the principal nuclear sites--even with American soldiers in harm's way in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tied to the other two men, and to the disputatious clerical elite below them, Ahmadinejad just isn't perceived by many (outside of Israel) as a sufficient threat.




Technorati - ]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, March 13, 2007

 

Kinder, Gentler Islamofascism

Kinder, Gentler Islamofascism

http://www.kxmb.com/getARticle.asp?ArticleId=103620

Kinder, Gentler Islamofascism





Here’s a little something that I think still has relevance today…






Subject: How to GENTLY impose Islamic rule on Society...a kinder, Gentler Islamo-fascism!


What is written on the white-board behind revolutionary guard commander Talaii (in larger black font)


a.. If you see women with thick lipstick, don’t use a razor blade to slash their faces (as has been permissible and very much done by the disciplinary forces patrolling the cities), use Kleenex.


b.. If you see too much makeup on women’s faces, don’t spray their faces with acid (as has been permissible and very much done by the disciplinary forces patrolling the cities), use rosewater.


c.. If women are wearing too short of a dress, give them a free chador (veil).


d.. If their scarves is too short, don’t use the slogan of: “yaa roo sari, yaa too sari” (which means ”either wear a scarf, or get smacked on the head”...this has been one of the regime’s most disgusting comments to Iranians women since the very early days of the revolution).


e.. Either cover their entire hair or gently cut their hair off.


The caption, in the bottom of the photo reads: The head of the police force of Tehran said: “The Irshad (guidance) Patrols should not treat people with an antagonistice approach.”



This is their attempt at a kinder, gentler Mullacracy!

-Michael Ledeen


NRO May 03, 2006



Technorati - ]

Labels: , , , , ,


 

Islamofascists Mullah regime calls its Buenos Aires bombing a Jewish conspiracy

Mullah regime calls its Buenos Aires bombing a Jewish conspiracy
http://www.judeoscope.ca/breve.php3?id_breve=3299 ^ | Mar 10, 2007Mullah regime calls its Buenos Aires bombing a Jewish conspiracyJudeoscope.ca, Canada - Mar 10, 2007

Tehran’s Islamofascists cowardly impute their horrific bombing of Buenos Aires Jewish community centre to Jews... Iran’s charge d’affaires in Buenos Aires.


Blaming the victim?

That's actually very Islamic, as in rape - blaming the woman. Just like 9/11, Islamists are comitting the crime & blaming their very victims.

Technorati - ]

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?