Thursday, April 22, 2010

 

LEADING APARTHEID AND OPPRESSOR OF THE WORLD SETS UP “HUMAN RIGHTS” DIV. [OIC], LOL


LEADING APARTHEID AND OPPRESSOR OF THE WORLD SETS UP “HUMAN RIGHTS” DIV. [OIC], LOL


This BITTER JOKE is in the news:

Major Muslim group sets up human rights division 22 Apr 2010

… The
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has announced it is setting up a
special division that will deal with human rights.



http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=173731




The regionalization of minority rights is most advanced within the West, in Europe and the Americas, By contrast, there is virtually no enthusiasm in Asia or the Arab/Muslim world to defelop regional norms on minortitiy rights. The whole issue remains essentially a taboo topic in many Asian and Middle Eastern countries…. Interestingly, the Organization of the Islamic Conference, representing Muslim-majority countries around the world, has a Department on Minority Affairs, but its formal resolutions focus exclusively on the rights of Muslim minorities living in non-Muslim majority countries (Khan 2002). (For representative example, see the OIC’s resolution ‘On Safeguarding the Rights of Muslim Communites and Minorities in non-OIC Member States’– Resoliution No. 1/10-MM (IS) , adopted at the 10th Session of the Islamic Summit Conference, 16-17 October-2203). The OIC has not attempted to codify norms, or to establish formal monitoring mechanisms, regarding the treatment of ethnic minorities within Muslim-majority countries, such as the oppression of the Kurds in Syria, the Ahwaz in Iran, the Hazars in Afghanistan, the Baluchs in Pakistan,the ‘Al-Akhdam’ in Yemen, or the Berbers in Algeria.
http://books.google.com/books?id=yySlh_dSElQC&pg=PA308

OIC, World’s Leading Human Rights Violators, To Set Up Own Human rights division
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/03/oichuman-rights-commission-.html


Muslim Human Rights–A Record Incompatible with the Civilized World …5 Mar 2010 … Yet despite the documents’ lofty principles, the record shows the Arab world is one of the worst offenders in the field of human rights. …
http://bsimmons.technorati.com/2010/03/05/muslim-human-rights-a-record-incompatible-with-the-civilized-world-very-long-but-very-important/


Muslim extremist up for human-rights post 20 Apr 2010 … The Islamic legal code is enforced by religious police in Saudi Arabia and … Department has cited as one of the world’s worst abusers of human rights.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=143545


Last year International Christian Concern placed (Muslim) Eritrea at number nine in its annual Hall of Shame. According to the ICC the intensity of persecution was “high” and “increasing.” In the ICC’s report this year the group abandoned its attempt to rank persecutors, but again included Eritrea among the worst ten. Eritrea placed among the top four in intensity of persecution, along with North Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Somalia.
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/04/02/eritrea-doubly-evila



It’s something along the line of Libya (where 2 Million Africans are oppressed because of racism) & Iran (where everyone suffers under the Islamist boot, especially minorities have a “special” treatment from the bastion of “tolerance,” like: Bahai’, Christians, Jews, Azeris, Baluchis, Ahwazis, etc.) hosting a UN conference on racism.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Labels: , , , ,


Thursday, December 18, 2008

 

Human rights vs Islamic monstrous lobby globally and its power over the UN

Human rights vs Islamic monstrous lobby globally and its power over the UN


Rights experts attack Islam defamation drive at UN

Wed 17 Dec 2008, 15:33 GMT

By Robert Evans

GENEVA, Dec 17 (Reuters) - The United Nations should stop passing resolutions, largely promoted by Islamic countries, calling for laws against "defamation of religion", according to international experts on freedom of expression.

The four experts -- from Africa, Europe, Latin America and the United Nations itself -- said such laws were often used to shield religious leaders from criticism and to suppress religious minorities and non-believers.

"International organisations, including the United Nations General Assembly and Human Rights Council, should desist from the further adoption of statements supporting the idea of 'defamation of religion'," they declared.

http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnLH387871.html

Labels: , , ,


Friday, December 07, 2007

 

"Innocent Palestinians"?, say what? who? Hmm, a tiny fringy minority - maybe!


"Innocent Palestinians"?, say what? who? Hmm, a tiny fringy minority - maybe!





Don't you "love" it, to hear the term 'innocent
Palestinians'? another great production of the 'Palestinian'
propaganda greased by international monstrous Arab oil [not to be confused with
helping any Arab 'Palestinians, which the Arab world never thought nor seeks to,
of course, on the contrary, the Arab leaders have an "interest" & often
'help' in Arab Muslim 'Palestinians' kept down, amazing as it is, it serves
them an anti Zionist bashing front and a diversion from their oppression,
corruption and crimes on their own people] and Arab-Muslim political power
worldwide.


Well, why don't we examine the true meaning of
"innocent"?


True, usually, in any nation, group, the vast majority is
innocent, well meaning, its intentions, actions are directed towards
positivity.


However, the "specialty" of 'Palestinians' is that their
overwhelming majority is guilty, and we'll explain why.


* A society that its mainstream glorifies mass murder
["martyrdom"] (see:
http://pmw.org.il, http://memri.org
), is sick to the core.


* A society that votes overwhelmingly for the genocidal party
the Islamic Hamas - which up to this day still declares to annihilate all
[non-Arabs, non-Muslims, AKA] Jews (
http://pmw.org.il/bulletins_apr2007.htm#b120407 ) from Israel, and promotes Islamic supremacy domination all
over the world (
http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/2790, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=661486&contrassID=2&subContrassID=15
&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
, http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/016618.php ), is by-in-large a part in this fascist ideology and
deed.


* A society that it polls show, most favor ethnic cleansing of
Jews from its historic land and genocide bombing [carefully planned to be
carried out in the most crowded of places, specifically intended to
massacre as many unarmed innocent Israeli civilians as possible], (
http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3%3Fid=28550
,

http//www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-10/20/content_273601.htm
)
is a
racist genocidal "society".


* A society that encourages to sell one's child to the
devil, to the death camps (see:
http://TecahKidsPeace.org ), where religious
figures and parents love to instill hate in their children for the "apes and
pigs" [AKA Christians & Jews], where mothers from hell "love" their
children in the Islamic militant ideology of 'kill & be killed' -
'Palestinian' motherhood, is twisted all around.


* A society that since its inception has produced nothing but
lies, denying that most were immigrants into the land of the Jews, calling every
lost battle a "massacre", then expanding the monster lying machine of fake
images Pallywood (see:
http://www.take-a-pen.org/english/Articles/PLE.htm, http://www.seconddraft.org/movies.php)
and never honored one detail of any peace agreement with Israel, can't
claim to have one iota of honesty in its entity, [Never forget this, every
time you hear "Palestinians" say, claim, just about anything of a "Palestinian"
source has about the same degree of credibility].


* A society that chooses death over life, Jihadism over
education, self destruction over advancement, is the "best" model for self made
misery.


* A society that shoots behind little shoulders of own kids,
or behind squirts of own women, is nothing but the "perfection" of
cowardice evil.


* A society that would do anything so that its kids die [from
covering for adults terrorists, plain shooting its Arab kids like Muhammad Al
Dura
http//www.eretzyisroel.org/~ginsburg/aldura
,
pushing children in the frontline, to firing from crowded areas, etc. http://www.israel-wat.com/x1_eng.htm
http://www.tzemachdovid.org/Arab_Violence/shield.shtml
http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/middleeast/Children_Soldiers.asp
http://honestreporting.com/articles/45884734/reports/Children_Under_Fire_.asp
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp441.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=19060], in
order to be looked upon as a "victim", can't be granted that.

WE JUST CAN'T GRANT THEM THAT!



Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Sunday, November 04, 2007

 

Britain's love affair with the Saudi kingdom - tale of Saudi's Islamic theocracy's Oppressive brutality

Britain's love affair with the Saudi kingdom - tale of Saudi's Islamic theocracy's Oppressive brutality

Britain's love affair with the Saudi kingdom

By Jemima Khan
Last Updated: 12:01am GMT 04/11/2007


King Abdullah arrived at Heathrow last Wednesday morning for the
first State Visit to the UK for 20 years – five planes, 13 family members, an
entourage of several hundred. No women.

I've been to Saudi Arabia a few
times. It's not much fun being a woman there. I suspect it's worse being a Saudi
woman. And worse still being her migrant maid.

It's a mad place and the
rules there have got nothing to do with Islam.

advertisementI've had my
feet beaten, not once but twice – first by a stick-wielding crone at Mecca for
not wearing socks, then by a pool attendant when I (swathed entirely in
compulsory trick-or-treat black) took my son to the hotel pool for a paddle.

I've heard old ladies complain that they are so harassed at night by the
frustrated male youth of Jeddah that they have to take their scarves off and
reveal their raddled faces just to scare them off. The irony of having to show
your face to protect your modesty was entirely lost on them.

I've also
woken up mid-flight on the plane home from Jeddah to London and discovered that
the passengers who embarked in full hijab have all been replaced by Bond Street
babes.

In Saudi Arabia, a woman can't travel abroad, leave the house or
even be examined by a doctor without the express permission of her husband. She
cannot be seen with any man except a close family member, the only exception
being her chauffeur – and that's a necessity because legally she's not permitted
to drive. She cannot marry a non-Muslim (or even a non-Sunni Muslim). And she
cannot wear anything other than a long black cloak and headscarf in public.
Although women account for 70 per cent of all graduates, they make up just 5 per
cent of the workforce. If they contravene the strict laws, they risk public
floggings or execution.

A few years ago, 15 girls died in a school fire
in Mecca because religious police ("The Commission for The Promotion of Virtue
and Prevention of Vice") prevented them from leaving the blazing school building
as they were not wearing correct Islamic dress and there were no relatives
outside to receive them. Apparently the police beat them as they tried to
escape.

Some would say the rules are as inexplicable (not to mention as
unIslamic) as in Afghanistan under the Taliban, where a friend of mine – a
Pakistani journalist – had his pubic hair measured at a check point (with a
stick with duct tape on the end shoved into his shalwar) to see if it was
cropped in accordance with religious custom.

But the difference is that
our government expressed outrage and bombed Afghanistan for their human rights
abuses as well as for harbouring (mostly Saudi) terrorists. And, for good
measure, we bombed Iraq too, at least in part for their human rights abuses and
lack of democracy.

King Abdullah, on the other hand – our Prime
Minister's "friend" with whom, according to Foreign Office Minister Kim Howell,
"we have many values in common" – gets a ceremonial welcome, a couple of
banquets, breakfast with the Queen at Buckingham Palace and meetings with Gordon
Brown, David Cameron and Prince Charles.

The Prime Minister failed to
bring up the subject of human rights or democracy. Or the fact that Saudi Arabia
exports and sponsors an extreme and distorted form of Islam to the rest of the
World.

The madrassahs in Pakistan, which gave rise to the radicalism of
the Taliban, have been funded by Saudi money since the Afghan jihad.

And
a hoard of malignant literature can be found inside as many as a quarter of
Britain's mosques, published and distributed by agencies linked to the
government of King Abdullah. These "education pamphlets" call for, amongst other
measures, the beheading of Muslims who abandon Islam, attacks on homosexuals,
religious segregation of society, for women to stay indoors and interfaith
marriages to be banned.

Nor did our PM mention the persecution of Shias,
homosexuals, non-Muslims, the public floggings, the torture, the detentions
without trial or the maltreatment of migrant workers. Nor the total lack of
freedom of expression and information nor the ban on trade unions, political
opposition and non-Muslim religions.

Does our government really care
about human rights and democracy?

The message is, it's business as
usual, everything forgiven, as long as you're a country which is pro-West,
strategically important, oil rich and able to buy billions of pounds worth of
our arms.

There's nothing new about it. It's not even that surprising.
In fact, our politicians can't even be bothered to offer an excuse.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/11/04/do0407.xml


Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, November 01, 2007

 

Britons Protest Visiting Saudi King [against the Evil Islamic Oppressive Empire]

Britons Protest Visiting Saudi King [against the Evil Islamic Oppressive Empire]
CBS ^ 10, 30, 2007


Britons Protest Visiting Saudi King

Britain's Queen Welcomes Saudi King;
Protesters Condemn Rights Abuses In Kingdom

LONDON, Oct. 30, 2007

----------------------------------------------------

(AP) Queen
Elizabeth II welcomed Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah Tuesday with an honor guard
and rode with him to Buckingham Palace in her gilded carriage, passing
protesters who condemned the oil-rich kingdom for alleged human rights abuses.

Before arriving Monday for the first state visit by a Saudi king in two
decades, Abdullah accused Britain of failing to act on intelligence that might
have prevented the 2005 London transit bombings. Analysts said the comments
appeared to be an attempt to distance himself from the extremists and at the
same time pre-empt attacks on Saudi Arabia's record of fighting terrorism.

"I don't think the U.K. should be hosting human rights abusers," said
Anna Jones, 26, who donned a mask of Queen Elizabeth as she joined a row of
dozens of other protesters along the procession route.

Other protesters
yelled and waved banners condemning the British government's "hypocrisy" and
saying: "You can't do this in Riyadh."

Vince Cable, acting leader of the
opposition Liberal Democrats boycotted the visit, claiming the kingdom has a
poor human rights record, especially regarding torture, public executions and
discrimination against women.

Before the ride to the palace, Abdullah
reviewed an honor guard at a parade ground in central London, a lavish welcome
criticized by the demonstrators.

Later at a halal banquet hosted in
Abdullah's honor, the queen spoke of "shared values" and said links between the
two countries' armed forces were "stronger than ever."

Abdullah,
speaking through a translator, praised Britain's "sense of tolerance" and
appealed for its help in securing peace for the Palestinian people.

Saudi Arabia, the world's leading oil producer, is an absolute monarchy
where citizens are expected to follow a strict interpretation of Islam.
Convictions of murder, drug trafficking, rape and armed robbery carry mandatory
death sentences by beheading.

As the pageantry unfolded in London for
Abdullah's visit, two men convicted of murder were beheaded in the Saudi capital
of Riyadh, bringing to 119 the number of people beheaded by the kingdom this
year.

British officials acknowledge the abuses, but say Saudi Arabia is
their closest ally in the Middle East and Abdullah, 82, is helping it to slowly
reform.

Abdullah was scheduled to meet Prime Minister Gordon Brown
Wednesday to discuss Iraq, the Iran nuclear standoff, the Middle East peace
process and counterterrorism.

A cartoon in The Daily Telegraph on
Tuesday depicted Brown lauding "universal human rights" but bowing to the Saudi
king.

Others accuse Saudi Arabia of spreading ideas that fuel extremism
and terrorism.

The Saudi royal family's legitimacy depends on a
puritanical version of Islam known as Wahhabism. The Saudi royals face the
delicate task of maintaining the approval of some of the same clerics who
inspire al-Qaida-oriented terrorists.

The London-based The Policy
Exchange think tank said in a report published Tuesday that organizations linked
to the Saudi government have been trying to export that puritanical version of
Islam by distributing extremist literature to mosques and Islamic centers in
Britain.

The material called for violence against enemies of Islam,
including women and gays who demand equal rights, according to the think tank.

Abdullah accusation that Britain failed to act on intelligence that
might have prevented the 2005 London transit bombings touched off debate about
the kingdom's response to terror.

British officials denied the king's
claims, saying they received information from Saudi officials but it was not
about the London transit bombings, which killed 52 commuters and four suicide
bombers.

Abdullah's visit has also been clouded by a U.S. investigation
over whether a Saudi prince received kickbacks in an $87 billion arms deal with
a British weapons manufacturer. The British government dropped its own
inestigation after then-Prime Minister Tony Blair said it would put British jobs
in jeopardy and could weaken Saudi cooperation in combating terrorism.

Critics accuse the government of trying to cover up Saudi corruption to
safeguard Britain's financial interests in the country, the biggest market for
British exports in the Middle East.

Blair ordered the investigation be
dropped in December amid news reports that claimed Saudi officials had
threatened to drop plans to buy a new Eurofighter aircraft from British
aerospace firm BAE.

U.S. authorities are still waiting for British
investigators to release their files.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/30/ap/world/main3432961.shtml


Technorati -




Labels: , , , , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?